A couple of weeks ago I attended my annual public order training course. In the past this has involved three days of running round a former air base near Wolverhampton in a riot helmet whilst wielding a shield and fire extinguisher and dodging petrol bombs thrown by enthusiastic instructors who act as a menacing group called ‘hostiles’. Or at least it used to. Recently the training has changed somewhat as the force sees a need to make it more realistic to what we actually do. This year has seen a rise in the number of demonstrations and protests where the vast majority of people taking part are not hostile at all, they just want to air their views in a visible presence. Peaceful protests are nothing new but the police seem to be continually criticized in how we police them.
On the second day of my training the result of the inquest into the tragic death of Ian Tomlinson was announced. I was at a local meeting that night and when I mentioned what I was doing the next day somebody made the comment ‘Don’t go unlawfully killing anyone’. Maybe it was because I was tired but I was quite put out by that. It suggested I was part of an organisation that has no regard for human life, when the reality is exactly the opposite.
The person who made the comment, who is a very decent and upstanding member of the community, had the view that police with the support of governments both past and present, are routinely becoming involved in violence that seems to be coming the norm in dealing with demonstrations. The person strongly disapproves of ‘kettling’ and arresting people before public events so that they can’t demonstrate. They felt that we seem to be turning more and more into a state which doesn’t allow freedom of expression. That person is not alone in holding these views or being amongst a section of society who see the police role as being on the ‘other side’ to the demonstrators.
I strongly disagree that violence is the norm in dealing with demonstrations. Our training is all about trying to deal with situations to prevent violence. There is a difference between being forceful (which at times is unavoidable) and being violent. Any form of force used has to be justified and proportionate. So if someone is trying to jostle past a line to get to a rival football fan for example I may be justified in holding them back, if they tried to hit me with a brick I may be justified in striking them with my baton..it would depend on the individual circumstances.
Tactics such as ‘kettling’ (as the media have called it) and arresting people before the event are controversial and unpopular but in my view have come about not because the police want to prevent protests from taking place but because senior police officers find it so very difficult to separate the groups intent on violence & mayhem from the peaceful demonstrators. In fact rank & file officers dislike ‘kettling’ as much as the demonstrators. Would you want to be the person facing the barrage of questions, challenges and anger for hours on end in a cordon?
I think it is healthy that organisations such as Liberty question our methods and that we try to work with them to improve for everyone. I believe we will see less ‘kettling’ in future because protesters are now wise to it and I question whether it really works in the long term. It just causes anger & resentment amongst those people not there to cause trouble and fuel to justify violence amongst those who are.
I don’t think it is true that we don’t allow freedom of expression in this country . The soaring popularity of social media, and legislation such as the Human Rights & Freedom of Information Acts have made the general population not only more aware but also more likely to challenge and question. Look at the way Facebook was used so successfully to co-ordinate last years peaceful but determined protest against the ANPR camera scheme ‘Project Champion’ in Birmingham. It is to the police’s credit that in that case they listened and took action to put things right.
I also think it is sad that people who want to protest peacefully see the police as ‘the other side’. That’s really not why we are there. There is a famous saying attributed to the French writer Voltaire: ‘I may not agree with what you say but I will defend to the death your right to say it’. The police are present at public demonstrations to protect life and property and to keep the Queens peace. Sometimes they will silently agree with the protesters, sometimes they won’t, but I wager my next pay slip that every one of them passionately believes in that saying.
As a post script I was very proud that my serial this year was made up of 50% female officers including Inspector and Sergeant. West Midlands Police has come a long way since I joined in 1979, when women made up just 13% of the force and were not deemed to have the physical strength to deal with public order situations. My generation fought hard for this equality and it’s one of the reasons I still attend training, despite feeling like I’m the ‘team mother’.